Week in Review 2/18/2017

Standard

Here’s a news round up of some of the things you might have missed this past week.

State News:

  • Teachers around the state are having problems passing their certification test. The test is terrible, not these teachers. (link)
  • Marion County retrains and secludes more mentally challenged students than the state average. By a lot. (link)
  • There’s a bunch of bills working their way through the Senate in support of guns. One of the worse is SB646 which would make it a non-criminal offense to briefly show off your gun. (link)
  • Good news for Governor Scott. His drug testing of welfare recipients, in which his company was set to profit on, is being allowed again under a GOP Trump administration. (link)
  • A good bill (SB544) would let people correct their signature mismatches for vote-by-mail ballots. (link)
  • The bill that banned doctors from talking about guns got overturned. (link)

State Budget:

  • Florida House Speaker Corcoran might sue Governor Scott over a lottery contract. On it’s own it looks silly but put into context over the massive disagreements on the budget and Visit Florida this is a big deal in an escalating battle that could very well lead to a government shutdown. (link)
  • The Republicans Governor Rick Scott’s fight over the budget is getting ridiculous. He sent out robo-calls in Republican lawmakers who oppose his jobs plan districts this week. A state government shutdown is getting more and more likely each week. (link)

Immigration:

  • Palm Beach County saw hundreds, maybe even thousands of students stay home in protest of Trumps migration laws as part of “a day without an immigrant”. Some school had as much as 35% of their student body stay home. (link)
  • An undocumented woman went to court to get a restraining order on her abusive boyfriend. She get’s arrested by ICE. The point of all of this isn’t to stop undocumented people from living in the USA. It’s to scare them. Undocumented people will be much less likely to seek redress for domestic abuse, or any crimes committed against them, because of actions like this. (link)
  • Daniel Ramirez Medina is a 23 year old DACA recipient who was detained by ICE. His lawyers are hoping it was a mistake and not part of a Trump policy of disregarding DACA. (link)
  • Changes to NAFTA could affect farms in Florida as the winter growing season coincides with Mexico’s and their cheap labor/lax labor laws make their imports cheaper. I don’t care so much about Florida farm owners but more so for Florida farm workers like those in the Fair Food Standards Council who are having their gains threatened by outsourcing to Mexico. (link)
  • Miami-Dade County voted 9-3 to affirm the Mayors move against being a sanctuary County. While most places in Florida and around the nation are standing strong or even reinforcing their commitment towards immigrants, Miami-Dade is in full Trump retreat. Shameful. (link)
  • A Florida House committee voted 9-5 along party lines to withdraw from the federal refugee program. This bill likely won’t go much farther, and it’s not very legal, but it shows that heartless Republican partisans aren’t just in DC. (link)
  • Trump was considering mobilizing 100,000 national guards to round up undocumented people. It looks like the leaked memo was considered but decided against. (link)

Random Trump mess:

  • Trump has nominated Alexander Acosta as Secretary of Labor. In 2008 he helped get pedophile and political ally Jeffery Epsetein a sweetheart plea deal (link)
    • Andrew Pizder withdrew his nomination to be Labor Secretary. Like rats leaving a sinking ship. (link)
  • The Republicans have half rolled out their ACA replacement. It’ll cut by about 50% the money paid to states who expanded medicaid, will let people buy crap insurance, convert medicaid to block grants for states, and is would most certainly kick millions of people off insurance while forcing millions more to buy crap plans. (link)
  • Dems are trying to use an obscure law to force Trump to release his tax returns. The Republicans are blocking the measure but they’ll keep trying. You can call the chair of the committee Rep. Brady at (202) 225-4901 to pressure him to release Trumps tax returns. (link)
  • Trump claimed there was a terrorist attack in Sweden at a campaign rally in Florida. Most media said there was no terrorist attack but there actually was one in January. A few neo-Nazis bombed a refugee center. (link)
    • Here’s a more full listing of the lies he said at the rally. (link)
  • Here’s a primer for a constitutional crisis free non-Trump presidency. (link)
  • Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is upset people are being mean to her. Turns out she didn’t realize that she can’t purchase the support of people who use public education like she did to the GOP. (link)
  • Palm Beach County isn’t liking the Winter White House. (link, link2)
  • Michael Flynn famously said he’d be in jail if he did a 10th of what Clinton did. Will we hear chants of “lock him up” anytime soon? (link)
  • Trump is looking to send ground troops into Syria. (link)
  • Turns out Trump’s campaign team talked with Russia. A lot. (link)
  • Trump officially abandoned a two state solution with Israel and Palestine. Unofficially the US had abandoned it in all but words years ago. (link)
  • Trump repealed an Obama executive order limiting how much pollution coal companies can put into rivers and streams. Is American great again yet? (link)

Gainesville Voter Guide – 2017

Standard

Gainesville’s city elections are on March 14th in which At-Large 2, District-2, and District-3 commissioners will be elected.

These elections have a low turnout. The last three comparable elections had ~15% turnout. Hell, Commissioner Warren won her run off by 128 votes in 2014. In the same year, Commissioner Carter won with 180 votes. These elections have such low turnout that individual voters and their social networks can easily sway an election. All the more reason for you to go out and vote.

For the upcoming city elections I recommend: 

  • Jenn Powell for AL-2
  • Harvey Ward for D-2
  • David Arreola for D-3

You have to live in the district to vote for Ward and Arreola but anyone in the City can vote for Powell. Here’s an easy voter guide you can take to the polls with you.

Vote-by-mail ballots are already out and early voting is from Monday, March 6th through Saturday, March 11. Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday from 9 AM – 5 PM. Tuesday and  Thursday from 10 AM – 6 PM at the Supervisor of Elections Office, the Millhopper Branch Library, and the Cone Park Library.  Election day voting is on Tuesday, March 14th from 7AM – 7PM.  You can find your voting location here.

At Large Two:

Gainesville is a progressive town and deserves progressive leaders. Helen Warren was elected on razor thin margins in 2014 against Annie Orlando. A major distinguishing factor between Orlando and Warren surrounded the biomass plant. Different camps flocked to each of these candidates with most conservative voices and some progressives surrounding Orlando in an odd coalition. Orlando had the support of the  Chamber of Commerce and the Sierra Club. The AFL-CIO and Equality Florida were firmly behind Warren in 2014.

Warren as a commissioner has been a disappointment. She’s a great person who has the potential to be a great commissioner; but has currently fallen short. What motions has she made to champion progressive causes? What plans has she rolled out to address inequality? Homelessness? Discrimination? After thee years on the commission what accomplishments can she point to? Whatever she has done has earned her the support of the Chamber of Commerce and lost her the support of the AFL-CIO and the Sierra Club.

Jenn Powell has very little experience as a politician. She was a delegate from Alachua County for Bernie Sanders to the Democratic National Convention. She was a pivotal member of the “Bern Unit” that brought Sanders to Gainesville in 2016. Her coalition is made up of Bernie supporters, former Warren supporters, environmentalists, union activists, and most of the progressives that supported Orlando in 2014.

I’ve heard a lot of criticisms of Powell being too new, unrefined, and unready. Oddly enough these are similar criticisms made of Warren in 2014. Powell is a true working-class person who will bring this needed perspective to the commission. Please lookout for classism when you hear people talking about Powell’s ability to serve on the commission. I’ve had to call out more than a few people for their comments. (side note: you probably shouldn’t joke about a person’s class to a labor rights activist)

I’ve talked to some people who are staying out of this race because they don’t think Powell can win, but a few factors point otherwise. A lot of Warren’s 2014 coalition feels isolated by her and will either stay home or vote for Powell. Powell also has a network of sporadic voters who will cast their first City ballot this March. There is also likely to be a higher turnout due to the heightened political environment. When elections are decided by such few votes these changes can equal a win for Powell.

I’m supporting Powell for At-Large 2 because she’ll be a strong, consistent voice for working people in Gainesville

District Two:

D-2 is the most conservative district in Gainesville. Of course, by most conservative I mean it’s 51% Democrat and 26% Republican. This seat is being vacated by soon to be former commissioner Todd Chase who is termed out. Chase has been a consistent detractor against progressive causes on the commission. This seat has been occupied by a Republican ever since then D-2 Commissioner Lauren Poe lost in 2011 by ~400 votes.

There are three people running in this election so there’s a chance that it will go to a run off on April 11th as a candidate needs 50% plus 1 to win outright.

Harvey Ward is a progressive through and through. Even before he was running for office he was a common sight at progressive events. He never showed up for face time with voters or for a quote in the media but to be part of the movement. He’s tabled for the Alachua County Labor Coalition, gathered signatures for a living wage, and lent his voice and time lobbying for  progressive causes. In short, Harvey Ward is one of our own and has earned your vote.

Perry Clawson is a Republican who has been endorsed by Commissioner Chase. He’s been very reasonable in all the interactions I’ve had with him. I’d even go as far as to say that his politics are to the left of Chase and he’d likely be a Carter style Republican. What makes him unelectable is his violent past. In ’92 he was picked up for Battery/Theft in Orange County, in ’03 for Batter/Domestic Violence in Seminole County, and in ’10 for stabbing a man in the stomach in South Carolina.

The most disturbing to me is the domestic violence case in which the police officer wrote:

At some point she fell out of the bed onto the floor. When asked, Mr. Clawson denied ever touching his wife. Mrs. Clawson suffered a bruise to her bottom lip and an abrasion to her left knee.

When Deputy Gamber and I arrived on scene, Mrs. Clawson became was visibly upset declaring nothing was wrong and that her husband did nothing to her. Mr. Clawson advised that it was his wife who set off the alarm signaling violence within the home.

He further advised that at no time did he touch his wife, but could not answer as to how she received the bruises.

The 2010 case in South Carolina was dismissed because of a mistrial but I believe a civil case is still ongoing. I’ve yet to hear him respond to this in its totality, only the domestic violence incident. In that instance he points out that it was investigated by multiple agencies, he was cleared of any wrong doing, and that he was able to keep his top secret military clearance. This is still highly concerning and should give everyone pause.

Sheryl Eddie is running for the second time in this district. She’s a solid candidate with good politics. She’d definitely be an important added voice to the mostly boys’ club that is the City Commission. The one qualm I have with her is that she claims she gets along with everyone, including the Chamber of Commerce and groups I don’t agree with. As a general rule I don’t want a commissioner to get along with the Chamber or any groups that consistently work to undermine working people’s issues. Mostly, I’m not supporting Eddie for this seat is because Ward is running. If you are split between Ward and Eddie I’d recommend casting your ballot for Ward. If Ward can get 50% +1 we can avoid an April run off.

District Three:

David Arreola is seen as a long shot to take out the incumbent Craig Carter in D-3. Arreola is young (26 years old) and has a lot less money than Carter. He would be the first Latino to serve on the commission adding much needed diversity to a Commission that’s 6 white and 1 African American.

Arreola’s politics are solid and he would make a great commissioner but getting him elected is the trouble. Carter, while a Republican that I butt heads with frequently, is very accessible. He has also moved away from his conservative positions and voted for progressive causes. He voted for the City to stop using mountain top removal coal and came out in support of the wild spaces public spaces tax. Carter also made the motion to increase workers’ pay to $12.25 an hour last year which is the the only reason it passed. Two sitting democrats voted against this motion the month before.

But can Arreola win? I think he can for a few reasons:

  1. The district is a bit different than it was in 2014. The district is now 50% Democrat and 23% Republican. And it’s 60% Democrat for those 65+ who are the most likely to vote. Party ID is going to be key in this “non-partisan” race.
  2. This is a student heavy district and students don’t normally vote in city elections. But I’m expecting a higher turnout in this election due to the heightened political climate. Also, a lot of these young people voted in November so their records should be up to date.
  3. Craig Carter has isolated himself from his base. While I’ve been shocked and happy with his progressive votes his coalition has not been thrilled. How many of his people will stay home because he went against the Chamber and supported the Wild Spaces tax? A dozen? How many more will leave their ballot blank in protest against his living wage motion? Another dozen or so? Keep in mind that Carter was elected in 2014 with only 180 votes.

Arreola has a real shot at winning this election. While Carter has been good on some issues (and terrible on others) I’d rather have a reliable progressive vote than a compassionate conservative as a commissioner.

Week in Review 2/11/2017

Standard

Here’s a weekly news roundup of some of the more interesting and/or under-reported things that happened this last week.

State News:

  • Florida might have a government shut down because the Republican House, Republican Senate, and Republican Governor can’t get along.(link)
  • “Alligator Ron” Bergeron might run for Florida Governor in 2018. This rich guy is really excentric saying that he’d have to put a hitching post to the governors Manson for his horse. Can you imagine him vs John Morgan? (link)
  • State Sen. Randolph Bracy might primary Sen. Bill Nelson in 2018. I’m not sure how to feel about this. (link)
  • SB 80, a Florida bill that would gut access to public records passed an important committee this week. (link)
  • Big sugar is trying to hold up a massive bill to clean up lake Okeechobee. It’s polluted discharges lead to massive die offs last year. (link)
  • Marco Rubio might have received hundreds  of thousands of calls urging him to oppose Devos for Education Secretary but that’s nothing compared to the 100,000 + she game him. (link)
  • HB19, the bill that would let people sue abortion doctors for emotional distress, passed a house panel last week. (link)
  • Turns out a bunch of State lawmakers are also employed by lobbyist. Naked corruption. (link)

Immigration:

  • University and college campuses are hesitating on becoming Sanctuary Campuses. (link)
  • Miami-Dade turned over 11 people to ICE in the week since Mayor Carlos Gimenez withdrew the county as a sanctuary city. (link)
  • The chair of the Miami-Dade’s Dem Party got thrown out of a commission meeting for asking about the move away from being a sanctuary city. This is just a taste of what’s to come. (link)
  • And so the raids start. Trump promised to deport undocumented immigrants who commit crimes and that includes Guadalupe García de Rayos. She was found using a fake Social Security number in 2008 and has met with ICE regularly to update her case. The Obama administration prioritized violent offenses for deportation which encouraged people like Guadalupe to cooperate with ICE. During a scheduled meeting she was arrested and deported. Actions like this will push the undocumented community further into the shadows. And just to be clear, that’s the point. Beyond the racism and xenophobia the 1% want a fearful class of non-citizens whose labor they can more easily exploit. And Trumps agenda feeds into this. (link)

Trump Mess:

  • Trumps approval rating in Florida is 34%. It’s a 73% approval rating among Florida Republicans  and an 8% among Florida Dems . The majority (52% ) also don’t want to cut off funding to Sanctuary cities and 56% oppose building a wall. (link)
  • Fivethirtyeight has a good read on the next steps on Trumps travel ban. They will likely make an emergency application with the Supreme Court with a decision as soon as next week. Alternatively, filing a petition for ceriorari would allow time for Trumps  nominee Neil Gorsuch to be appointed. They could also do nothing and wait for the lower courts to rule on the issue. What will Trump do? I’m not even sure if he knows. (link)
  • A bill in the Congress has been filed that will make salting illegal. Essentially this bill would allow a boss to not hire someone if they have a desire to organize the shop into a union. (link)
  • Trumps approval rating in Florida is 34%. It’s a 73% approval rating among Florida Republicans  and an 8% among Florida Dems . The majority (52% ) also don’t want to cut off funding to Sanctuary cities and 56% oppose building a wall. (link)
  • Trump is set to issue a directive shielding companies from disclosing if their products contain conflict minerals. (link)
  • Devos was confirmed as Education Secretary 51-50 (Pence casting tie breaker) and Sessions as Attorney General 47-52 (one democratic breaking ranks). This isn’t normal. These appointments are usually not this contentious. It’s not that the Dems are being whiny, it’s that these are some of the most divisive people to ever be nominated to a cabinet.
  • A bill in the Congress has been filed that will make salting illegal. Essentially this bill would allow a boss to not hire someone if they have a desire to organize the shop into a union. (link)
  • Attorney General Sessions has his priorities. One of the first things he’s doing is undoing the Obama era protections from transgender students. (link)

Hate Watch:

  • Remember that guy who set that mosque in Orlando? He’s going to jail for 30 years. (link). On a similar note, a Fort Myers man is facing 11 years in prison and a $350,000 fine after making threats to two Muslin grocers. (link)
  • Anderson Hall at UF was marked up with pro-Trump and racist messages this week. This follows an a noose being found on a teachers desk, Nazis protests on Holocost remembernce day, and white nationalist flyers being posted around campus. UF President Fuchs released a statement, like he has for the other events but doesn’t seem willing to do much action.
  • Brevard fired an assistant public defender for wearing a Black Lives Matter tie (among other things). (link)

Week in Review 2/4/2017

Standard

Here’s a quick week in review of some of the more interesting things that happened in the last week.


  • In 2018 John Morgan might run for Governor, sponsor a constitutional amendment to raise the minimum wage, or both. (link)
  • Florida joined the lawsuit against Miami-Beach Mayor Levine’s living wage ordinance which would set the cities minimum wage at $10.31. This is part of Levine’s campaign for Governor in 2018. (link)
  • SB610 would make businesses who ban guns liable to lawsuits from legal gun owners if a mass shooting happens. (link)
  • SB614 is a better marijuana bill. It’d open up more dispensaries and be less onerous than Sen. Bradley’s SB 406. (link)
  • Republican Sen. Jack Latvala is considering running for governor. I’m not sure how he’d beat Commissioner of Agriculture Adam Putam in a primary though. Latvala is one of those mythical moderate Republicans who has worked with union, immigrants, and environmentalist to stop reactionary Republican bills in the last. (link)
  • The number of people leaving their ballots blank or putting invalid names such as Bernie Sanders and Mickie Mouse on their ballot for the 2016 presidential election in Florida was double that from 2008. At 1.7% the 161,000 votes could have made a difference considering Trump won Florida by 113,000 votes. (link)
  • A study titled “The Riches of the Melting Pot: How Diversity in Metropolitan Areas Helps Grow the Wages of Low and High-Wage Workers,” from New American Economy has some very interesting information about immigration in Gainesville, FL. In 1990 6.1% of the population was foreign born but in 2011 it was 11%. According to the study almost all of the economic gains from the bottom 25% of earners are due to this increase in diversity. Increased diversity accounts for only 1/4 of the income gains for the top 25% earners. (link)
  • HB 409 would require county Supervisor of Elections officers to text voters on the first day of early voting and also on election day. This bill would increase voter participation so it’s unlikely the Republican controlled House, Senate, and Governor will support it. (link)
  • Jacksonville is the last major city in Florida that doesn’t offer protections to LGBTQ people under their Office of Equal Opportunity. The commissioners are now debating if they should do a referendum or vote on the ordinance themselves. A referendum is being sought so that reactionary lawmakers can hide behind the veil of democracy while abdicating their responsibility to protecting their LGBTQ residents. (link)
  • Gov. Scott and Florida Legislators are going to have a big fight over the budget. Scott believes there will be a $2.8 Billion surplus while legislative economist project only $7.5 million. Whose right? Probably the legislators but that won’t stop Scott from pushing more tax cuts for the rich. Hopefully the conflict will keep them too busy to further cut services for working people, their attacks on women’s reproductive health, etc. (link)
  • Here’s a good breakdown of what Gov. Scott’s budget proposal looks like. A lot of it won’t make it through the Florida House/Senate though. (link)
  • You’ll be hearing a lot of self congratulatory back slapping over the record k-12 spending from Florida Republicans this year but it’s not true. While we’re spending more than a billion more than our 2007 high water mark our per student spending is still down. Also, inflation. (link)
  • State Sen Bean and Rep Metz are looking to file legislation to punish so called sanctuary cities. (link)
  • Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the US Supreme Court. If appointed he’d be be to the right of recently departed Scalia and one of the most conservatives to ever serve on the Court. One of the biggest concerns with him his his opposition to assisted suicide due to life being inherently precious. This might be used as an opening to start rolling back women’s reproductive rights. (link)
  • Trump ordered a raid that killed around 30 civilians including an 8 year old American girl and an American service man in Yemen. The 8 year old American was was Nawar al-Awlaki was the daughter of American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki who put out youtube videos for al-Qaida. Obama killed Anwar al-Awlaki in a drone strike in 2011. I’d like to remind you that Trump promised to kill the families of terrorist while on the campaign trail.  (link)
  • Trump’s Muslim ban canceled some 100,000 visas. His administration said it affected less than 200 people. What a bunch of… alternative facts. (link)
  • Some good news. Due to the large push back US Rep Chaffetz withdrew his bill to sell off over 3 mill acres of public land. (link) In a similar move the Uber CEO drops out of a Trump business advisory  council. (link)
  • Trump is seeking to “destroy” the law limiting political activity of Churches. (link) The House has already introduced a bill on it. (link)
  • Trump is seeking to roll back the Dodd-Frank Act. In a nut shell, Trump doesn’t want brokers to have to act in their client’s best interest. On the second week in office Trump is giving a massive boost to wall street crooks. (link)
  • The US Senate passed a rule making it easier to energy companies to pay off and be paid off by foreign counties. I’m sure former Exxon CEO and Secretary Tex Tillerson is salivating. (link)
  • Lifeline, a program that helps gives poor people access to the internet is under attack by the Trump administration. Nine companies were given the go-ahead to join the program but Trumps new FCC Chairman Ajit Pai put a stop to that. (link)

Week in review 1/28/17

Standard

Here’s a week in review for the week ending on 1/28. These snippets of news pieces are geared towards Florida politics and underreported stories. I’m purposefully not writing as much about what Trump is doing, not because it’s not important but because we’re being bombarded with news of his actions daily. If you’re interested in tracking him, Politico has a running list updated multiple times a day.


    • I have an ongoing list of bills of interest in the Florida Senate here. I’ll be updating it periodically as new bills are filed. A big one sticking out to me is SB534 which would preempt local hiring preferences and nullify sections Gainesville Living Wage and Alachua County Minimum Wage Ordinances. It’d also hamstring dozens of progressive ordinances throughout the state.
    • ACLU Florida is holding rallies in Miami, Orlando, and other airports on Sunday in protest of Trumps Muslim ban. (link)
    • Lots of people participated in Florida for the Million Woman’s march. Over 10,000 in Miami, 14,000 in Tallahassee, 20,000 in St. Pete. Gainesville had 1,500 and even smaller communities like Ocala, Paltaka, and Live Oak had actions. (link)
    • South Florida Counties that protected immigrants are folding to Trumps attacks on Sanctuary Cities. Miami-Dade is changing their policies while Broward and Palm Beech Countys are saying they never were and have no desire to become sanctuary cities.  (link)
    • Fivethirtyeight has an interesting article out on the reasons for increased hate crimes. They ran the numbers and say income inequality has a strong correlation. (link)
    • The University of Florida is under Title IX investigation for the mishandling of a sexual violence report. (link)
    • Florida Democrats walked out on Mark Krikorian,, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, which is a Southern Poverty Law Center describes as a hate group. He was there, of course, to spread lies about refugees and immigrants. (link)
    • SB120, the anti-immigrant bill that would 1 criminal charges against undocumented immigrants passed a major chock point on Tuesday. The bill passed 5-4 along party lines after the Judiciary committee amended the bill to only apply to charges violent offenses committed by undocumented people. The bill is much more likely to become law now.
    • Sen. Rubio won’t take the lead on a Dreamer bill. Trump has made it clear he’s going to let Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) executive order expire. A bipartisan bill is being pushed by Sen Graham that would supersede anything Trump could do to the Dreamers but it’s a shame that Sen. Rubio isn’t making it a priority for him. (link)
    • Poor elderly people in Florida are in danger of having their services cut. The Florida Council on Aging is asking for $10 more remove 1,287 at risk elderly Floridians from waiting lists. The Government’s response was to ask them to trim close to $13 million from their budget. (link)
    • Relief might be on the way for poor people caught in the criminal justice system. Currently people who can’t afford the court fees get fined more and often have their licences revoked.  And without a licence many people can’t work and so fall further behind. SB302 would change that by limiting the conditions on which a license can be revoked and limited payment to 2% of net income per year. There’s issues with the bill but it’s a big step in the right direction. (link)
    • The Stand Your Ground on steroids bill (BS128) passed the Judiciary Committee. This was the major choke point for the bill so it’s likely to become law. The bill shifts the burden of from in stand your ground cases from defendant to prosecutors making it more difficult to even have a trial. (link)
    • The Florida Democratic Party seems to be changing gears under Bittel. In years past the strategy has been to turnout in SE Florida, the I-4 corridor, and ignore the rest of the start. Bittel’s FDP is offering $100,000 grants to small and medium counties to do voter registration and become better organized. (link)
    • Florida union membership dropped from 6.8% in 2015 to 5.6% in 2015. This 1.2% drop was a lot higher than the national 0.4% drop in membership. It still pays to be a in a union though as non union workers make on average 80% the wages of union workers. (link)

Florida Senate Bills to Look Out For – 2017

Standard

Bills of interest from Florida Senate:

Updated 2/17/17

This is a working document being updated as bills come in. In order for a bill to become law the same version has to pass the House and Senate and be signed by the Governor. The House is unwieldy and harder to influence so I’m focusing on the Senate.  We expect some 1,500 bills to be filed by the filing deadline of March 7th. With only ~250 filed we have a long way to go. Please leave a comment with corrections, additions, deletions, etc. Contacting Senators now and attending committee meetings is paramount in influencing these bills.

Bolded bills are ones to look out.

Education:

  • SB2 : Major higher education bill. Would expand bright futures to cover 100% tuition, some fees, and $300 for books. Pushes students to graduate in 4 years, gives universities ability to adopt block tuition (pay for 15 credit hours no matter how many are taken), expands 2 year college to 4 year university pathway, expands scholarship program for 1st time students.
  • SB4: Adds ~$4 million to hire faculty at universities. Focus on medicine, law, graduate level business, and the like.
  • SB78 – Require recess in schools.
  • SB82 – Takes away in-state tuition to Dreamers (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals).
  • SB258: Up to $3,000 bonus for Advanced International Certification of Education. Makes the bonus a performance pay incentive based on students scores.
  • SB274 / HB403:  Forgives $16,000 in loans for STEM teachers after 8 years,  
  • SB286: Adds human trafficking awareness as requirement in schools.
  • SB436/HB303: Allowing prayer in public schools.
  • SB438: Forces school boards to review their out of school suspension policies.
  • SB468: Adds $10 million to voluntary prekindergarten through 3rd grade reading programs.
  • SB478 would shield university presidential searches from public records. Considering these positions are highly paid and often political in nature this should be opposed.
  • SB 538: Requires charter schools to show need in school district when applying.
  • SB604 increases the amount of millage a school board can levy.
  • SB688 establishes a scholarship for students who want to become teachers.

Environment:

  • SB98 – Anti-fracking bill.  
  • SJR108 – Another anti-fracking bill.
  • SB162 – Bans plastic bags.
  • SB422: Bans fracking. This one has legs.
  • SB532: requires that the Department of Environmental Protection notify the public about pollution.

Criminal Justice and Guns:

  • SB70 – would treat attacks on police as a hate crime.
  • SB128 – Expands protections under Stand Your Ground Defense. Puts onus on prosecutor as opposed to defended to prove Stand Your Ground not applicable in pre-trial.
  • SB260: Clarifies cyber bullying death threats.
  • SB 302: – would make it harder to arrest poor people who cannot pay court costs. It’s a good start but doesn’t go far enough. Have to show burden to pay fees before licence is revoked which could introduce bias. Also takes a lot for poor people to come before a judge to argue that they’re too poor to afford fees.
  • SB312: attempts to remove some bias with eyewitness identification.
  • SB418: Makes it a felony for causing damage to monuments for soldiers, law enforcement, etc. Could be used to target people going after Confederate monuments.
  • SB546: Withholds booking photos until convicted of a crime.
  • SB606: Makes it easier for inmates over 65 to get released early.
  • SB610: Let’s you sue people who don’t allow guns in their establishment.
  • SB616 allows people to essentially check their guns at courthouses.
  • SB618 allows people to carry guns in airports.
  • SB620 allows people to carry guns in legislative meetings.
  • SB624 sets guidelines for body cameras on cops. Problematic because it lets cops review footage before writing a report. 
  • SB626 allows people to carry guns to any county, etc, school board, etc. meeting.
  • SB640 allows people to carry guns into career centers.
  • SB644 – open carry of handguns.
  • SB646 allows firearms to briefly be displayed.

Healthcare:

  • SB102: Prevents retroactive denial of most claims.
  • SB328/ H543: Updates nursing licensing and continuing education requirements. 
  • SB614 – Medial Marijuana Act

Women’s Rights:

  • SB176 – Bill to make tampons tax free.
  • SCR 194: The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the US constitution.
  • SB252: Makes tampons, diapers, baby wipes tax exempt.
  • SB348: Fetal Pain Bill will ban abortions after 20 weeks.
  • SB412: Alimony reform bill. Could disproportionately affect women.

Worker’s Rights:

  • SB534: Preempts local hiring preferences and nullify sections Gainesville Living and Alachua County Minimum Wage Ordinances. Sponsor Sen. Perry.
  • SB410/HB219: Adds gender identity to anti-discrimination prohibitions in employment. Also adds the “Helen Gordon Davis Fair Pay Protection Act” which prohibits employers from asking about past wages or disallowing workers to discuss their wages with each other.
  • SB516: improves workers’ compensation benefits for first responders. 
  • SB636 and SB638 commissions a study on income inequality and allows state government agencies to prepare income inequality impact statements.
  • SB666 – crates the Florida Competitive Workforce Act which adds sexual orientation and gender identity to anti-discrimination clause.

Voting Rights:

  • SB72 -Would make it easier to register to vote through DMV.
  • SB74 – Proposes amendment to state constitution for the automatic restoration of rights for felons.  
  • SB242: Popular vote for US president.
  • SB270: Proposal to state constitution to restore voting rights for most felons. HB51 and HB53 in the House.
  • HB 409 would require county Supervisor of Elections officers to text voters on the first day of early voting and also on election day. This bill would increase voter participation so it’s unlikely the Republican controlled House, Senate, and Governor will support it.
  • SB544: Makes it easier to correct Vote By Mail signature errors.
  • SB726 allows people to turn in their vote by mail ballots to early voting sites.

Other:

  • SB80 – Makes it harder for lawyers to get fees for violations to public records requests.
  • SB120 – Anti-immigrant bill that would 1 up any offense an undocumented persons. Would make 1st degree misdemeanors a 3rd degree felony, 3rd felony a 2nd felony, etc.
  • SB140 – Open carry bill.
  • SB144: Prohibits use of phone while driving by those under 18.
  • SB160 Bill to increase minimum wage $1 plus inflation a year until $15 an hour is met.
  • SB254: Bans assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines.
  • SB268: Updates housing discrimination law.
  • SJR 482: Adds proposal to the state constitution for term limits to Supreme Court Justices.
  • SB486: Increases the amount of tax-exempt income for corporate income tax and franchise tax.
  • SB578/HB273 – Bans conversion therapy for those under 18.

Study Guide: Collective Action for Social Change

Standard

Collective Action for Social Change: An Introduction to Community Organizing by Aaron Schutz and Marie G. Sandy is a solid read for any community based activist (Here’s a PDF if you can’t afford a hard copy). Those new to organizing will appreciate the foundation, history, and theory within this book, while seasoned activists will find new frames to asses and improve their community organizing skills. 

51us3icuil-_sx331_bo1204203200_

While reading this I couldn’t help but think that if I had read it 10 years ago I would have saved the causes I champion a lot of time and frustration. In this study guide I will draw out some of the most important lessons in this book, some of the theory behind this organizing model, and some prompts for further readings.

The book is broken up into 4 parts. Part I is a basic overview of organizing, Part II is some history and theory of organizing, and Part III is some case studies. Part IV is the main course though. There’ll never be a how to manual but this section gets pretty close.


Part I: Overview (Pages 1-44)

A key component of this approach to community organizing is that it exists to make change within the existing political and economic landscape. Within the first few pages the authors make it clear that:

“..the organizing tradition has always been reformist, not revolutionary. Organizing groups want influence over, not destruction of the social institutions that affect the lives of the oppressed”.

This doesn’t mean there is not conflict with power structures but simply that the goal is not to overthrow the system.

While this will cause more radical organizers to dismiss the rest of the book they would be mistaken. Whether it’s Mao’s Mass Line, Entryism, or the neo-Alinsky style of organizing found in this book the goal, at its core is the same: How can millions of oppressed people can be mobilized to exert political power in their lives.

Power is defined here as the ability to make change. How powerful an organization is is determined by how many people it can mobilize, how much money it has, what its reputation is, how often its input is sought before a decision is made, etc. The basic formula laid out here to build power is to have an organizer bring community leaders together under a type of coalition or new group and have everyone agree to collective goals through a shared values.

Organizers are usually paid staffers who have training in this area while the leaders are the real decision makers. The organizers shouldn’t push their agenda or try to mold leaders into adopting their views. Organizers’ goal are to move leaders to a collective yet vague value set such as justice, peace, or equality. Leaders are the the ones who decide what the problem is that conflicts with these collective values, how to cut this problem into tangible issues, and how to break those issues into an actionable strategy. Of course the organizer has her/his opinions, views, and expertise that influence their leaders but this cannot be stressed enough: An organizer’s job is to follow leadership.

From here the win/loss of the campaign is consolidated through organizational growth and increased power. And this is the major takeaway from this section. The most important thing for an organization isn’t winning but growing the organization so that it can make more and bigger wins in the future. This means that how you win is more important than actually winning. I’ve been part of many groups that have won a campaign but fizzled out within the year because it didn’t consolidate its victory into growth.

The authors take some time to go over activities that do not fall under the organizing category. Most of the critiques against these types of activities are that they don’t build power or challenge the existing power structure. While this is true, many of these often add to organizing efforts. In most cases organizing without any of these elements would be impossible. Activities the authors don’t consider organizing are: 

  • Legal action
  • Mobilizing
  • Activism
  • Political campaigning
  • Advocacy
  • Community development
  • Direct service
  • Community building
  • Movement building
  • Nonpartisan dialogues
  • Lifestyle changes

Quick takeaways:

  • It’s a truism that you can only gain something for one group of people if another group gives something up. This means that there will always be opposition to any organizing effort.
  • Organizations need to use one pagers. No one has time to read a 25 page white paper.
  • Targets are always people. It’s the university president -not the university. It’s the Mayor –  not the city.
  • Organizations need a depth of knowledge about their opposition. Their opposition’s reaction determine how you win.
  • Advocates speak on behalf of a group of people. They get people to carry their water while activists work with the affected community to empower them to make the change themselves.

Prompt Questions:

  • What are the limitations to focusing on reforming public institutions as opposed to taking them over? What are some of the pitfalls of being reformist? Of being radical?
  • What are some other ways to measure an organization’s power?
  • What are some ways an organization can build power over the short term? The long term?
  • What is organizing vs other forms of community involvement discussed here? How do they add to organizing? How do they take away from it?

Part II: History and Theory 47-107)

Organizing is an American tradition. From the early days of the Industrial Workers of the World to the 60’s Students for a Democratic Society to today’s Black Lives Matters, organizing is how we’ve accomplished our collective goals. Learning from what did and didn’t work for those that came before us is one of the best was to grow as an organizer.

This part of the book is very interesting and frustrating at the same time. Some of my favorite organizers are left out and others’ importance are overblown. But the purpose of the book is to give a brief overview and it does that pretty well. I’ll only point out a few things that I feel were missed or are too important to pass up.

The Labor Movement organizing section highlights the Industrial Workers of the World and states matter-of-factly that their ideologies ran counter to traditional values of American Workers which gave an excuse for government repression. While this is true a great lesson of today’s labor movement can be drawn out. Many of the radicals in the IWW were recent immigrants and brought their traditions with them. A similar situation is arising today in the labor movement with more and more immigrants, many undocumented, joining not only the workforce but often times the labor movement too. Although traditional unions such as the UFCW and Culinary Workers Union have a lot immigrant workers, many more immigrants are joining workers associations and centers such as the Coalition of Immokalee Workers.

In the section titled “Organizing the Middle Class: The Last Years of Alinsky’s Organizing (1964-1972)” showcases the limits to this style of organizing. A quote from Alinsky himself is

“One thing I’ve come to realize,” he said, “is that any positive action for radical social change will have to be focused on the white middle class, for the simple reason that this is where the real power lies.”

Alinsky also fancied himself the moderate voice in the 60/70’s and was critical groups such  as the Black Panther Party for not having a “coherent strategy for building power”. I have a major problem with this shortsightedness and dismissiveness of more radical groups. Radical organizing focuses on the most oppressed peoples because, in their view, this is the only place revolution can come from. This is key to understanding the frame upon which neo-Alinsky style organizing fits.

There are major limits to organizing only within one specific group of oppressed peoples without linking up with allies. Radical in the 60/70’s knew this and tried to overcome it by having black, brown, and white radicals come together into unified organizations. To gloss over the richness of their achievements robs us of their valuable lessons. A good read on some of this history is Hillbilly Nationalists and the Making of an Urban Race Alliance.

But alas, Alisky cuts to the core of the issue. To him the potential for making reforms can only come if the white middle class is involved because this is where the current power structure lies.

More notes:

Question Prompts:

  • What are the demographics needed to make meaningful change? Where does the potential for power come from?

Part III Case Studies Pages 111-177

A great way to learn about organizing is to study the mistakes and best practices from the large number of groups working for social change. Many of the stories in this section are worth the read. 

An important lesson many liberal activists learned is from the 2008 Obama campaign and the 2012 Organizing for America program. Both of these campaigns were wildly successful at this but they did little to build the Democratic Party into a party that could do more than win the presidency. Almost all governors and state houses are run by Republicans today, in part, because these campaigns focused on electing an individual as opposed to growing the parties power. That said there are still many good lessons to draw out of his campaigns and electoral politics in general.

The most important lessons learned from the Obama elections is that storytelling is an art form. It’s the way humans have conveyed information since before we came out of the caves. When we hear a moving story we feel emotions and we are much more likely to act. Facts and figures don’t move people to action, stories do.

This is why Obama canvassers were told not to get into policy discussions with potential voters and instead direct them to the website. The goal of canvassing isn’t to sway voters with logic or facts but instead to have an emotional connection. And this isn’t just Obama, it’s all of politics. The emotional anti-Obama vote is just as real as the “yes we can” vote. Stories are also why all good speeches start from the “I”, a with a personal narrative; move to the “we, a collective experience; and finish a with a shared vision and how to achieve it. The Obama campaign did this masterfully.

Storytelling is important for getting out the vote for a candidate or moving people to take an action but by itself it doesn’t build power in a community. The Democrats won the white house but have been beaten in nearly every state and local election.

Questions:

  • What are some lessons you have drawn from other organizations that you have worked with?

Part IV: Key Concepts 181-283

Chapter 11:

This is the “how to manual” for organizing that people were looking for when they bought this book and it doesn’t disappoint. 

A key concept for this organizing approach is understanding public and private relationships. Private relationships are those you have with your friends and family. These relationships are built on loyalty, love, and are for the most part unchangeable. Public relationships on the other hand are built on self-interest, accountability, and respect. Confusing the two will make your life hell. Politicians and organizers alike try to bend each other into the personal category to get what they want. How many times have you heard someone say something to the effect of “how can you be so hard on the Mayor, he’s such a nice guy”. Understanding the rules of the game is paramount to earning a seat at the table.

Some of the pitfalls that happen when we confuse public and private relationships.

  • We refrain from criticizing public officials publicly.
  • We look for love and loyalty from politicians when this should never be expected in the public sphere. The trite saying that “there are no permanent friends or enemies in politics” holds true.
  • We don’t bother, annoy, picket, etc. the public sphere because this would be rude in the private sphere.

The private and personal relationships dovetails perfectly into one of an organizers most important tools: the one on one in which an organizer meets with a community leader. Every one on one meeting should have 4 goals.

  1. Uncover self interest.
  2. Develop a relationship.
  3. Evaluate leadership potential.
  4. And recruit to the organization.

When doing one on ones there are three main types of people who you will identify based on  their self interest:

  • Selfish people want to get something from the organization such as individual power and more individual respect in the community. They won’t stick around during the lulls in organizing and will only show up for the cameras. They’re unable to put what’s best for the community ahead of their own selfish needs.
  • Selfless people on the other hand want to give their left arm for the cause. They’ll come to every meeting, every sign making party, and every action for months until they burn themselves out. Their major flaw is that they are not seeking to exert their own self-interest in the public sphere for the long haul. Organizing is a marathon, not a sprint.
  • Self-interested people are in it for the right reasons. A persons self-interest is a person’s passion. This is informed from their stories, who their friends/family are, and where they came from. Tapping into this is key to recruiting people to any organization for the long haul. A method that progressives borrowed from religious community is the “coming to Jesus” story. Asking someone to tell you the story on how they became an anti-war, an education, worker rights activist, etc. is a great way to reveal someone’s self interest.

Through this process a relationship is formed. The reason developing a relationship is important is because people are accountable to other people. If someone tells you they’ll be at a meeting they are much more likely to attend than if an organization sends them an email blast. The type of relationship developed through one on ones can start out as public and end up in the private sphere. Many of my closest friends including my partner I’ve met through organizing.

Next, figure out their leadership potential. The main goal of an organizer is to develop leaders and this starts with figuring out what kind of leader they can be. Native leaders are those who already have followers such as pastors or heads of organizations. If you are meeting with native leaders than your goal here is to move them to your organization’s values.

Leaders can either be the loud type or the quiet type and space in any organization needs to be made for both. Most of the time an organization’s leaders are not the ones with the most followers, the best at public speaking, or the policy wonks. Most leaders in any group, more often than not, are the people most willing to ignore their everyday lives for the organization. These are not always the best leaders so as many barriers for those unable or willing to ignore their everyday lives needs to be made. This means having onsite childcare, providing dinner, meeting in the evenings, etc.

But in the end a leader justifies their position because they represent their constituents. Without these leaders then an organization becomes an advocacy group.

Notes:

  • The Iron Rule: Don’t do for others what they can do for themselves. Don’t forget that an organizer’s job isn’t to be the workhorse but to equip its members with the tools to exert their own power in the community. Of course, there’s always special circumstances in which you’ll have to jump in and make sure something is done before a rally but more often than not someone else can and should do the work.
  • Leadership and democracy is tricky. Consensus based organizing is good and all but it breaks down at a certain point. If an organization is to grow to a size that it can exert real power in a community than it needs to have a hierarchy and delineation of responsibilities. The Tyranny of the Structureless should be required reading for an organizer.
  • Strong leaders are often ridiculed for creating a “cult of personality” but often times they are a frame in which the organization exists. This isn’t necessarily bad as long as the leader isn’t dominating the organization and is aware of her/his position.

Questions:

  • Where does consciousness raising fit into the public and private spheres?
  • What type of leader are you? Have you been in organizations that didn’t respect your type of leadership?
  • What are some of the limits to consensus based organizing. What about an organization with limited or no constituency input.

Chapter 12: Power and Targets.

Saul Alinsky defined power as “the ability to act”. Simply put, without power there’s nothing that an organization can do. The ability to influence the political process can be bought with money or earned through organizing. If you are reading this you likely don’t have the kind of money needed to buy power. You know you have power when those with power (elected officials, CEOs, etc) recognize your organization as a legitimate participant in policy decisions.

All participants in policy decisions are targets for organizing. The individuals who can make the decision, whether it be a vote or policy change, are the primary targets. Those that influence these targets such as donors, their church, and important voting blocs are the secondary targets. Sometimes the best way to get a target to change a position is to influence a secondary target.

It cannot be overstated how important it is to pick the correct target. To confuse targets makes your organization look sophomoric, ill-prepared, and is very embarrassing. That said, if you know the president of an organization has the power to make a decision that doesn’t mean that they won’t shift responsibility to someone else.

So how do you know who to target? First of all, targets are always people. It’s the CEO – not the bank. It’s the commissioner not the commission. And in order to influence a target an organizer needs to be able to identify with them. If your target is very religious then shaming their position based on religious grounds will strike a nerve. If they’re a dyed-in-the-wool realpolitik type of person going after their major financial backers will make them see that it’s less expensive to support you than to oppose you.

At the start of any campaign the organization should do a power analysis to determine your target:

  1. Who has the ability to make the change (primary target).
  2. Who has influence on this person (secondary target).
  3. What are the self interests of potential targets.

Once the correct target is picked out it’s time to polarize the target. Even though someone might support you 40% of the way, at the end they’re going to have to say “yes” or “no” to your organization’s demands. This doesn’t mean that you burn bridges or don’t compromise. You have to work with these targets again in the future and every campaign has some type of negotiations. Also remember that the larger goal of organizing is to get a seat at the table with the other decision makers. If your organization makes a major win but is seen as irrational they’ll stay sidelined in future policy decisions.

Notes:

  • Ask for a timeline from the target which will make sure that they’ll get back to your organization. This will keep them from punting on the issue.
  • Taking public credit for the achievements of the organization grows power.

Questions:

  • Do a quick power analysis of an issue that your city or county can influence.
  • If the goal is a seat at the table then what is too radical? Can attacks be too personal?

CH 13: Cutting an Issue:

The world is a messed up place. We have global climate change, institutional racism, poverty, and enough war to make anyone sick. These are all major problems that we all face. Problems make us feel small. They make us feel like there’s no way that we can possibly influence something so encompassing.

There’s a commonly held belief that the reason we have so many problems in the world is because people don’t care enough to stop them. I’ve met enough people, even those that feign being a-political, to know that the great masses of people care deeply about these problems.  The perception of apathy is because the masses of people don’t know how to change these problems.

This is where organizers step in to break these problems down into issues that can be acted on. Climate change goes from an amorphous collective angst into issues such as a new bike path through the city, protecting state land from oil drilling, and stopping a pipeline. These issues can be acted through campaigns and doing so can grow the power of an organization. While none of these alone, or even together, will solve climate change it adds to a shared vision and builds an organizations capacity to make larger wins in the future.

The issue that an organization chooses must have a solution. If an organization doesn’t have a solution then the solution will be imposed. For example: when an organization presents an ordinance as the solution then the onus is on the commission as to why this isn’t a reasonable remedy.

Tips for picking issues:

  • An issue either needs to excite or piss off your constituency.
  • If the issue doesn’t build power for the organization it isn’t a good issue. A good issue should do some of these:
    • Grow membership.
    • Improve membership skills.
    • Increase finances.
    • Develop relationships with powerful people.
    • Educate the public on your organization and the issue(s) they focus on.
    • Threaten the self interests of powerful people.
    • Enhance your negotiating power.
    • Build your organization’s reputation.
  • Good issues have the ability to generate controversy and outrage among the public. This in turn brings attention to your actions and solution.
  • GOOD ISSUES ARE WINNABLE! Good issues are tangible. Remember, the problem might not have a clear solution but the issue should.
  • People care about good issues. If the majority of people are educated about an issue and still don’t act on it, it’s not a good issue. Starting with issues that people care about is important. The goal of an organizer isn’t to make everyone share your rankings for important issues: it’s to empower people to make these changes himself.
  • The simpler the ask the easier it is to hold the opposition accountable and educate your members.

Chapter 14 Tactics and Strategy:

Now that we have an issue and targets it’s time to talk about tactics and strategy. A tactic or action is anything that puts pressure on your target. The sum of all the tactics in a campaign is the strategy used to win your issue. Aside from being critical to winning an issue actions also keep members involved. People tend to fade away is there’s nothing happening.

Criteria for a good tactic:

  • Puts pressure on the target or secondary target. This doesn’t necessarily need to be direct and could be something as simple as a press conference.
  • Includes a specific demand. There’s nothing more deflating than having to be asked what your organization wants. Powerful people know that expressions of collective angst fade quickly. If you’re only goal is to make noise they’ll weather the storm and wait for your organization to dissolve into the next thing.
  • Is outside the experience of the target. You want to challenge their comfort zone in one way or another.
  • Is within the experience of your members. If your members are uncomfortable with a tactic it’s the wrong tactic for the organization. What an organization is comfortable with changes throughout a campaign though. A group that doesn’t feel comfortable taking a street one week might be willing to shut down an intersection the following month.
  • Involves a large number of people. It’s only through being involved in an organization that new members are consolidated. It’s also usually through actions that new members are found.
  • Is fun and engaging otherwise no one will come back.
  • Educates members and develops leaders. You can only truly learn to fight power by actually fighting power. In order to educate and develop leaders your organization must:
    1. Involve a range of members at different leadership levels in the planning and carrying out of the action.
    2. Include an educational component. A speaker on the topic or a handout should be given explaining what the issue is and why it’s important.
    3. Have a summation at the end. Every action needs to end with an evaluation of what went well and what didn’t. Write these evaluations down and refer to them when planning future actions. The act of being self critical is a the best way to improve an organization.

Some examples of tactics are:

  • petition drive.
  • letter writing campaigns.
  • in-house media (videos, blog posts, etc).
  • turnout events (rallies, pickets, etc.).
  • visits with public officials.
  • public hearings.
  • accountability sessions.
  • citizen’s investigations.
  • educational meetings and teach-ins.
  • civil disobedience and arrests.

When developing an action it’s easy to fall into routine that is comfortable. If all an organization has ever done is petition gather then that is likely that they’ll propose to gather more petitions for a new campaign. Being creative is important for the success of any campaign but creativity for the sake of creativity can be silly and serve as a distraction. Over the long term your power comes from your reputation to powerful people. If this perception is damaged then so is your power.

Once the action is set and carried out the opposition will react and it’s very likely that the opposition will try one or all of the 7 D’s of Defense:

  1. Deflect – most powerful people surround themselves with layers of bureaucracy that make for easy scapegoats. The best way to combat this is to be prepared by being sure the target has the ability to act on the issue.
  2. Delay – I’ve never had a meeting with a politician that hasn’t tried to delay an answer. Always set a deadline for their response.
  3. Deceive – there’s lies, damn lies, and statistics. The people you are going up against are better funded and have teams of people with degrees in deception. They will try to baffle you with mistruths and you can only combat this with research. This is also why membership needs to be well informed so that they are not mislead by this counter tactic.
  4. Divide – If the organization or coalition doesn’t practice good discipline and solidarity the opposition will pick off a group of individuals to negotiate with. Often times when this happens the solution is imposed by the opposition with a splinter group accepting it as a compromise.
  5. Deny – this is usually done by denying meetings or saying no problem exist. To combat this organizations need to escalate tactics and apply more pressure.
  6. Discredit – the better funded opposition will likely attempt to discredit your findings or stance. Organizers should be prepared to defend this with good research and by maintaining the moral high ground. Even in this day in age it’s not uncommon for powerful people to red-bait organizations.
  7. Destroy – this happens when leaders or members are arrested or threatened. This is especially common for immigration rights groups being threatened with deportation. To counter this the organization needs to strongly support any person, from their own or any other group, who is facing this type of repression. Solidarity will not only help the individuals but also has the potential to expose the issue and organization to a wider audience.

Sometimes actions appear to just happen for people who just show up. But those who organized he action know it took 10 times as long on planning as it took to carry out. It takes a lot of work but it pays off to be prepared.  

Notes:

  • Power is not what you have but what the opposition thinks you have. The threat of an action is sometimes enough to get the result. The risk though is that if you cannot follow through then the organization’s perception is damaged.